Risk-adjusted BoM
Indicative direct material cost after volume and risk weighting.
Indicative direct material cost after volume and risk weighting.
Driven mostly by reducers, encoders, controller electronics, and force sensing.
Buy for demos, partner for pilots, build selectively for platform advantage.
Highest signal-to-complexity ratio for manipulation and customer impact.
The root issue is not merely supplier selection. It is leakage between engineering ambition and operational reality: over-specification, long-lead dependencies, manual calibration, and low learning from field failures.
The correction is to make sourcing decisions through a customer outcome model: uptime, failed picks, product damage, service cost, and deployment time.
Filter by sourcing risk to identify where procurement, engineering, and quality should focus first.
| Component | Spec | Origin | Cost | Lead | Risk | Choice | Action |
|---|
Estimated unit BoM
Risk-adjusted landed cost
Calibration hours per unit
Compare sensor choices by commercial readiness, manipulation value, integration burden, supply risk, and strategic differentiation.
Prioritize mitigation where business impact and switching difficulty are both high.
Use GelSight plus XELA or Contactile on fingertips. Show slip recovery, fragile handling, and contact-rich perception.
Ruggedize mounts, cables, cleaning process, firmware APIs, and diagnostic logging.
Build tactile dataset, automated calibration fixture, failure taxonomy, and vendor-neutral interface.
Develop replaceable skin, reusable electronics, and CynLr-owned manipulation models.